Swi Prolog Windows 10
- Swi Prolog Windows 10 1
- Prolog Windows 10
- Swi Prolog Download For Windows 10 32 Bit
- Windows 10 Iso
- Prolog Download For Windows 10
The following Comparison of Prolog implementations provides a reference for the relative feature sets and performance of different implementations of the Prolog computer programming language.
SWI-Prolog offers a comprehensive Free Software Prolog environment, which features fast compilation, robust and free of memory leaks, unbounded integer and rational number arithmetic based on GMP. Download standalone portable version of SWI-Prolog 7.2.3 for Windows 32-bit and 64-bit. Portable SWI-Prolog 7.2.3 is a useful IDE with code editor and debugger for Prolog Programming Language. Portable SWI-Prolog 7.2.3 Review. Prolog is a logic-based programming language with some rules and regulations. SWI-Prolog offers a comprehensive free Prolog environment. Since its start in 1987, SWI-Prolog development has been driven by the needs of real world applications. SWI-Prolog is widely used in research and education as well as commercial applications. How to Download Prolog software for artificial intelligence Course How to Install SWI-Prolog on WIndows and Linux Shah Wajahat. SWI- Prolog - Artificial Intelligence Course Prolog is a language of logic programming. In artificial intelligence, it plays an significant role. Prolog is designed mainly as a declarative programming language.
Top 10 Cool Free Windows Software (You'll Really Want) - Duration: 12:33. ThioJoe 463,512 views. Visual Prolog is a powerful programming language combining best features of logical, functional and object-oriented programming. It counts PDC Prolog and Turbo Prolog as its predecessors. The goal of Visual Prolog is to support industrial strength programming of complex knowledge emphasized problems. The SWI-Prolog executable swipl-win.exe can be started from the StartMenu or by opening a.pl file holding Prolog program text from the Windows explorer. 1 The.PL file extension can be changed during installation.
Swi Prolog Windows 10 1
Portability[edit]
There are Prolog implementations that are radically different, with different syntax and different semantics (e.g. Visual Prolog)[1] and sub-communities have developed around different implementations.[1]
Code that strictly conforms to the ISO-Prolog core language is portable across ISO-compliant implementations. However, the ISO standard for modules was never accepted by most Prolog implementors.[1]
Factors that can adversely affect portability include: use of bounded vs. unbounded integer arithmetic, additional types such as string objects, advanced numeric types (rationals, complex), feature extensions such as Unicode, threads, and tabling.[2] Use of libraries unavailable in other implementations and library organisation:[1]
Currently, the way predicates are spread over the libraries and system built-ins differs enormously. [..] Fortunately, there are only few cases where we find predicates with the same name but different semantics (e.g. delete/3)
Main features[edit]
| Platform | Features | Toolkit | Prolog Mechanics | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | OS | Licence | Native Graphics | Compiled Code | Unicode | Object Oriented | Native OS Control | Stand Alone Executable | C Interface[3] | Java Interface[3] | Interactive Interpreter | Debugger | Code Profiler | Syntax |
| BProlog | Unix, Windows, Mac OS X | Free for non-commercial uses | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ISO-Prolog, plus event-handling, CLP(FD), and tabling | |
| JIProlog | JVM, Android | Shareware/Commercial and AGPL | Yes | Yes | Yes via Java | Yes | Yes via Java | Yes | Yes | Yes | ISO-Prolog | |||
| Ciao | Unix, Windows, Mac OS X | GPL, LGPL | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ISO-Prolog, plus extensions | ||
| DOS-PROLOG | MS-DOS | Shareware | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Edinburgh Prolog | |||||
| ECLiPSe | Linux, Windows, Solaris, macOS | MPL | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Extended Prolog, Multi-dialect, including ISO | ||||
| GNU Prolog | Unix, Windows, Mac OS X | GPL, LGPL | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ISO-Prolog | |||||
| Jekejeke Prolog | JVM, Android | Distribution Evaluation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ISO-Prolog, Java API | |||
| JLog | JVM | GPL | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ISO-Prolog | |||||||
| JScriptLog | Web Browser | GPL | Yes | ISO-Prolog | ||||||||||
| jTrolog | JVM | LGPL | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ISO-Prolog tests[permanent dead link] | |||||||
| LPA-PROLOG | Windows | Commercial | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Edinburgh Prolog with extensions |
| Open Prolog | Mac OS | Freeware | Yes | |||||||||||
| Poplog Prolog | Linux (32- and 64-bit), Unix, Windows | Free Open Source | Only through POP-11, on Linux | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Edinburgh Prolog, with interfaces to Poplog Common Lisp and Pop-11 | ||||
| SICStus Prolog | Unix, Linux, Windows, macOS | Commercial | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ISO-Prolog |
| Strawberry Prolog | Windows, Unix | Freeware, Commercial | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not ISO-Prolog + extensions | ||||||
| SWI-Prolog | Unix, Linux, Windows, macOS | BSD License | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ISO-Prolog, Edinburgh Prolog | |
| tuProlog | JVM, Android | LGPL | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ISO-Prolog | |||||
| Visual Prolog | Windows | Freeware, Commercial | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| XSB Prolog | Linux, Windows, Solaris, macOS | LGPL | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ISO-Prolog, tabled WFS | ||
| YAP-Prolog | Linux, Windows, Solaris, Mac OS X, HP-UX | GPL or Artistic (user choice) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Edinburgh, ISO-Prolog, Quintus and SICStus Prolog compatible | |||
Prolog Windows 10
Operating system and Web-related features[edit]
| Web-related | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Conditional compilation | Sockets | Multi-threading | Tabling | HTTP client | HTTP server | HTML Parser | RDF Triple store |
| BProlog | Yes | |||||||
| Ciao | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| ECLiPSe | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| GNU Prolog | Yes | |||||||
| Jekejeke Prolog | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| LPA-Prolog | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||
| SICStus Prolog | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||
| SWI-Prolog | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Visual Prolog | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| XSB | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| YAP-Prolog | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||
Static analysis[edit]
| Name | Type checker | Determinacy checker | Call-pattern checker |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ciao | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| GNU Prolog | |||
| Jekejeke Prolog | |||
| SICStus Prolog | Yes | ||
| SWI-Prolog | Yes | ||
| Visual Prolog | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| XSB | |||
| YAP-Prolog |
Optimizations[edit]
| Name | Tail-Call Optimization | Choice Point Elimination | Environment Trimming | Just-in-Time Indexing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ciao | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? |
| ECLiPSe | Yes | Yes | Yes | multi-argument (compile time) |
| GNU Prolog | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? |
| Jekejeke Prolog | Yes (runtime) | Yes (runtime) | Yes (runtime) | Yes |
| SICStus Prolog | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| SWI-Prolog | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Visual Prolog | Yes (compile time) | Yes (compile time) | N/A | N/A (compile time) |
| XSB | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? |
| YAP-Prolog | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Release[edit]
| Name | Version | Date |
|---|---|---|
| BProlog | 8.1 | 2014-02-23 |
| JIProlog | 4.1.6.1 | 2018-03-17 |
| Ciao | 1.18.0 | 2018-12-19 |
| DOS-PROLOG | 6.0 | |
| ECLiPSe | 7.0 | 2018-01-22 |
| GNU Prolog | 1.4.5 | 2018-07-14 |
| Jekejeke Prolog | 1.3.1 | 2018-11-02 |
| JLog | 1.3.6 | 2007-09-13 |
| JScriptLog | 0.7.5 beta | 2007-09-10 |
| jTrolog | ||
| LPA-PROLOG | 6.0 | |
| Open Prolog | ||
| Poplog Prolog | V15.65 | 2015-10-14 |
| SICStus Prolog | 4.5.1 | 2019-04-03 |
| Strawberry Prolog | 3.0 Beta 4 | 2013-12-10 |
| SWI-Prolog | 8.0.3 | 2019-06-19 |
| tuProlog | 3.2.1 | 2017-02-14 |
| Visual Prolog | 9.0, Build 902 | 2019-04-26 |
| XSB Prolog | 3.8 | 2017-10-29 |
| YAProlog | 6.3.3 | 2013-01-21 |
Benchmarks[edit]
- Benchmarking issues: Odd Prolog benchmarking, Performance differences.[4]
- Benchmarking software: older, Dobry[permanent dead link], Aquarius benchmark suite, (Bothe, 1990),[5](Demoen et al. 2001), benchmark descriptions
- Benchmarking results: B-Prolog, SICStus, XSB,[6] SICStus vs Yap vs hProlog[7]
- Benchmarking results: Survey of java prolog engines by Michael Zeising
- Benchmarking results: OpenRuleBench yearly open-source benchmark of rule engines
References[edit]
- ^ abcdWielemaker, J.; Costa, V. T. S. (2011). 'On the Portability of Prolog Applications'. Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 6539. p. 69. CiteSeerX10.1.1.1030.9396. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18378-2_8. ISBN978-3-642-18377-5.
- ^Jan Wielemaker and Vıtor Santos Costa: Portability of Prolog programs: theory and case-studies. CICLOPS-WLPE Workshop 2010.
- ^ abC/Java interface can also be used for graphics and OS control.
- ^B. Demoen, and P. Nguyen, About unnecessary performance differences between Prolog implementations, Proceedings of the Colloquium on Implementation of Constraint and Logic Programming Systems (CICLOPS 2001)
- ^Bothe, K. (1990). 'A prolog space benchmark suite'. ACM SIGPLAN Notices. 25 (12): 54–60. doi:10.1145/122193.122197.
- ^A Summary of XSB Performance (1993)
- ^Demoen, B.; Nguyen, P. L.; Vandeginste, R. (2002). 'Copying Garbage Collection for the WAM: to Mark or Not to Mark?'. Logic Programming. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2401. pp. 194–208. CiteSeerX10.1.1.13.2586. doi:10.1007/3-540-45619-8_14. ISBN978-3-540-43930-1.
External links[edit]
- Overview of Prolog Systems by Ulrich Neumerkel
I am developing Prolog code and using SWI-Prolog on two different machines. Both SWI-Prolog installations are on Bash on Ubuntu on Windows 10.
Swi Prolog Download For Windows 10 32 Bit
I don't remember the steps I followed to install SWI-Prolog on the first machine, but it runs code requiring library(plunit) without a hitch.Running swipl --version on the console returns
In Tetris Link, based on the popular video game Tetris, players take turns dropping tetromino blocks into a grid, attempting to link same-colored tetrominos to score while simultaneously blocking opponents from doing the same. Players score points by linking three or more tetrominos together, but they lose points if they leave empty spaces in the tower grid. Buy Techno Source Tetris Link Game by University Games Challenging Brainteaser Game Based on the Classic Video Game For Ages 6 Years and Up: Board Games - Amazon.com FREE DELIVERY possible on eligible purchases. ABOUT TETRIS ®. Tetris ® is the addictive puzzle game that started it all, embracing our universal desire to create order out of chaos. The Tetris game was created by Alexey Pajitnov in 1984—the product of Alexey’s computer programming experience and his love of puzzles. Tetris style games. Tetris Link Board Game. By Techno Source. More Buying Choices $120.93 (1 used offer) Ages: 6 years and up. Tetris Link play at home game with Bonus 2 player travel game included by Techno Source. By Techno Source. 3.0 out of 5 stars 11. FREE Shipping. Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
On the second machine, on which I downloaded and made/installed from source, I get an ERROR saying source_sink 'library(plunit)' does not exist. Running swipl --version on the console returns
My understanding was that libraries for SWI-Prolog were release-dependent. Is that not the case? Perhaps the swipl --version values provide some insight? Unfortunately, I am stuck with this specific version of SWI-Prolog for compatibility reasons. So far my attempts to reinstall swipl on the second machine have been fruitless.